William James Society Forums William James Forum Letter in The New Yorker: WJ on experience vs. ‘philosophy’

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 month ago by Avatar photoPhil Oliver.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1653
      Avatar photoPhil Oliver
      Member

        Feeling It Out

        Alice Gregory’s article on the philosopher L. A. Paul and her circle of oddly amusing philosophers was itself amusing and instructive (“Note to Selves,” December 9th). A great deal of what passes for the pursuit of wisdom in academia these days is, indeed, esoteric, technical, and, finally, irrelevant. But it should be noted that Professor Paul is hardly a pioneer in asserting, however “hesitantly,” that “experience has a kind of value” and that philosophy ought to be less “detached from ordinary life.” William James and the pragmatists said it long ago. In 1900, James, immersed in preparing lectures that would become “The Varieties of Religious Experience,” described the “problem” he set himself as “to defend (against all the prejudices of my ‘class’) ‘experience’ against ‘philosophy’ as being the real backbone of the world’s religious life.”

        Phil Oliver
        Associate Professor
        Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
        Middle Tennessee State University

    Viewing 0 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    Scroll to Top